Every month or so we alternate between hosting CEO and CTO dinners. The aim of these is to bring together the leaders of our portfolio companies in an informal setting, where we hope everyone feels comfortable sharing issues, challenges, and tips. Over the years they’ve proven extremely productive and while one may be excused for thinking it’s just a chance for us all to have a convivial evening of good food and good wine, I sat next to one particular CEO on Monday who began restlessly asking when we were going to start broaching the subjects of the evening’s debate – testament, I think, to the value they expect out of the conversation.
I won’t go into huge detail on each point, but rather give a snapshot of the conclusions drawn from some of the discussions.
How to get better at delegating, and whether management or leadership coaching is something to consider.
For one of our extremely high growth portfolio companies, delegating has naturally become essential for the founding team. However, as many if not most founders can testify, giving up ownership of decisions can be hard.
After a lengthy discussion, a few valuable insights were drawn.
There’s a valid argument that in actual fact, management and leadership are different, but for the sake of this post, it makes sense to use them interchangeably, as the point stands regardless of semantics.
I think a natural (and perhaps subconscious) belief is that ‘leaders’ will take an employee on a journey of learning, development, and opportunity, whereas ‘managers’ will demand work from you and possibly even hold you back from your full potential (let the debate begin…). In this case, employees are going to be more enthused and motivated from working with a leader than a manager and that’s what you want, right? So, don’t underestimate the nuanced impact of job titles.
Management/leadership in year one of a startup is very different to year 3/4/5. Employees won’t necessarily scale with the business.
One of the trickiest challenges a startup has is getting it’s early employees to grow with the company. A good leader/manager in year one, may well not be so effective in year three. In year one, everyone’s all hands on deck and roles may be poorly defined. However, as you scale, increasingly specific skills may be required of the employee. This is not to say that this early employee is a jack of all trades and a master of none, but it might be that she or he is not the master of the required trade.
All the above is pretty straightforward and most CEOs would agree that these are just inevitable growing pains – the hard bit is telling this person that they’re no longer suitable for their current role. This employee has stuck with you through thick and thin and might even be a friend, so it’s going to be difficult. However, you need to be pragmatic and thus, you have to choose from the following options:
Of course, every case is different and you can always seek guidance on these matters. At Episode 1, we try to create an honest relationship with our portfolio companies, so that we are approachable in cases like this. Often we’ll be able to help or at least act as a sounding board to help drive your own decision.
How much to focus on future revenues, to the detriment of current revenues, and vice versa.
This is a question almost every startup will face. You have some initial customers that you work closely with to build a product that they love. This often means tailoring your product for them in a not-very-scalable way. This diverts your team’s attention away from the grand vision.
Here’s the toss-up: tailoring the product to initial customers means more revenue today and perhaps a shot at quickly reaching the golden £100k MRR ready for Series A. However, the Series A investors don’t make huge returns investing in bespoke, niche software solutions. They want highly scalable businesses with product market fit.
So, what to do about it?
If you’re going to tailor your solution to initial customers, make sure you keep at least one eye on what features are attractive to other customers and are thus scalable. Say no to building niche functionality which steals too much of your team’s time and does not contribute to achieving PMF.
In the end, you might end up with fairly bespoke solutions for a few key clients. This shouldn’t necessarily be seen as a problem – it can provide important revenue allowing you to throw more resource at the grand vision.
It’s pretty clear that every case must be evaluated on its own merits, but the following should play an important role in your decision-making process:
All in all, we had an excellent dinner; it was convivial, we did eat good food and drink good wine, but as usual, highly productive conversations were had and the founders took home valuable insights from the evening. I look forward to the next one!
4th floor, 112-116 New Oxford St, London WC1A 1HH